The
R. P. C. N. A.
is  not  the
Covenanter
Church.
Much could be said about the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America.  She is plagued by nepotism, feminism and wordliness.  Dispensationalism, evolutionism and other errors are tolerated in her congregations and courts.  At an International conference in the 1990s, old camp-fire choruses were touted as awesome new Psalm selections.  One congregation has used uninspired song and musical instruments - justified by doing this "praise time" before the minister says the invocation and the regulative principle becomes operative!

But one defection stands out above all others.  The R.P.C.N.A. promotes herself as the "Covenanter" Chruch, both on the signs in front of her meeting-places and in her publications.  This is far from the truth of the matter.
back to the Armed CONVENTICLE
According to Johannes G. Vos, whose book The Scottish Covenanters is sold by the R.P.C.N.A., "The perpetual obligation of the covenants [is] the formal principle of the covenanting movement."  In other words, a Covenanter is someone who believes that the Scottish Covenants are forever binding on the Nations and Church that swore them.  Those who do not allow that the National Covenant and the Solemn League continue to obligate Great Britain, her rebel children and the Presbyterian churches, are simply not Covenanters.

Now, how does the R.P.C.N.A. measure up?  In 1871 they swore an "American Covenant" that America
NEVER swore, and pretended that this bond was "in advance of" the Scottish Covenants.  In short, since 1871 the R.P.C.N.A. has explicitly denied that Covenants.  At that time, one minister said, "Let us bury the body of Moses in Moab, lest it be worshipped....Much of the old Covenants is incomprehensible." He obviously meant to say that the Scottish Covenants were dead, meaningless and superseeded like Old Testament ceremonies.  Further, he judges those who contend for their binding obligation to be idolaters.  Who will insult us by identifying the R.P.C.N.A. as the Covenanter Church?
By the time I joined the R.P.C.N.A. in the early 1990s, the apostacy of 1871 had born its fruit.  "Covenanters" were voting for Republicans (& Democrats?)  since they could now vote for "Christian" candidates!  The elders of the Broomall congregation told me that the 1871 covenant was historically important, but not binding on  the church.  So now, the "American covenant" - which never was subscribed by the U.S. government or the people of this nation generally - is not even binding on the American church!

In 1871, the excuse was made that it was not the Covenants, but the Confession of Faith that should bind us to the Second Reformation.  The Westminster Assembly, however, made no such distinction.  Nor did the Parliament of England or the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland.  The Westminster Documents are a cloth we ought not tear.
The R.P.C.N.A. now leaves none of the Covenanter creed unmolested.  The so-called RP Testimony uses the words "we reject this portion" in reference to the WCF.  The RPs violate the Directory for Publick Worship with thier "holidays" and continuous singing.  They ignore the Form of Government and reduce the three biblical offices (minister, lay governor & deacon) into two.   They cast the Covenants aside.  As one candid RP minister has admitted, "I'm sorry you were misled - this is in no way a covenanter church".  Their own words are sufficient to condemn them.
1